Carl Frank, writing …
Carl Frank, writing at Blogger News Network, explains why the “nuclear option” is actually quite properly referred to as the “Constitutional option”. Looking at the text of the Constitution itself, court precedent, and historical debate on this issue by the Founding Fathers, he creates a compelling argument that, for judicial nominees, the filibuster is unconstitutional.

Related posts:

  1. This from Q&O’s Jon …
  2. Looks like the Repub…
  3. Judicial filibusters…
  4. On his blog yesterda…

Filed under: Uncategorized

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!