Comments on: Applying the Geneva Convention to Non-Signatories https://www.thepaytons.org/essays/considerettes/?p=1909 Conservative commentary served up in bite-sized bits Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:14:52 +0000 hourly 1 By: Doug Payton https://www.thepaytons.org/essays/considerettes/?p=1909&cpage=1#comment-3404 Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:14:52 +0000 http://www.thepaytons.org/essays/considerettes/?p=1909#comment-3404 Just wondering; is al Qaeda a signatory?

]]>
By: caragh https://www.thepaytons.org/essays/considerettes/?p=1909&cpage=1#comment-3403 Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:45:24 +0000 http://www.thepaytons.org/essays/considerettes/?p=1909#comment-3403 i hope people think differently now, thats exactly why the geneva conventions were instigated to protect civilians that have not and will not be tried, its a means of ensuring justice on an international level, by saying these “terrorists” belong to no natin they are giving themselves authority to violate te conventions. Afghanistan and iraq are signatories of the conventions.

]]>
By: Webloggin https://www.thepaytons.org/essays/considerettes/?p=1909&cpage=1#comment-6 Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:52:58 +0000 http://www.thepaytons.org/essays/considerettes/?p=1909#comment-6 Stop The ACLU 9-6-06…

Of course the ACLU automatically accuses the U.S. of using horrific abuse to obtain our evidence without any evidence whatsoever to back that claim up.

……

]]>