Is science really al…
Is science really all about getting at the truth, or has the majority of today’s scientific community been sucked into playing politics?
Two of the world’s leading scientific journals have come under fire from researchers for refusing to publish papers which challenge fashionable wisdom over global warming.
A British authority on natural catastrophes who disputed whether climatologists really agree that the Earth is getting warmer because of human activity, says his work was rejected by the American publication, Science, on the flimsiest of grounds.
A separate team of climate scientists, which was regularly used by Science and the journal Nature to review papers on the progress of global warming, said it was dropped after attempting to publish its own research which raised doubts over the issue.
The controversy follows the publication by Science in December of a paper which claimed to have demonstrated complete agreement among climate experts, not only that global warming is a genuine phenomenon, but also that mankind is to blame.
With the Kyoto treaty, there’s a lot of politics involved in the global warming debate. Well, I call it a debate. Apparently major science publications would rather stifle dissent. In doing so, they become complicit in the myth that the scientific community is united in their view of global warming.
The author of the research, Dr Naomi Oreskes, of the University of California, analysed almost 1,000 papers on the subject published since the early 1990s, and concluded that 75 per cent of them either explicitly or implicitly backed the consensus view, while none directly dissented from it.
Dr Oreskes’s study is now routinely cited by those demanding action on climate change, including the Royal Society and Prof Sir David King, the Government’s chief scientific adviser.
However, her unequivocal conclusions immediately raised suspicions among other academics, who knew of many papers that dissented from the pro-global warming line.
Keep that in mind when you hear the myth.
(via Pejmanesque)
Filed under: Uncategorized
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Leave a Reply