Real Racism vs Liberal Violence
From James Taranto’s column in the Wall St. Journal Online:
Ho Hum, a White Supremacist Rally
"A rally of about 40 white supremacists Saturday on the lawn of Los Angeles City Hall drew hundreds of counter-protesters, sparked brawls in which two people were severely beaten and ended with crowds of demonstrators hurling rocks and bottles at police and departing supremacists," the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday. The violence came from those who had come to counter the hate:A bare-chested middle-aged man with Nazi insignias tattooed on his chest and back walked into a crowd of hundreds of counter-protesters gathered near 1st and Spring streets.
Surrounded, the man mockingly bobbed his head to the rhythm of demonstrators chanting "Nazi scum." About a dozen protesters suddenly began pelting the man with punches and kicks. He fell and was struck on the back with the wooden handle of a protester’s sign, which snapped in two. Police eventually reached the man and pulled him from the melee, as blood poured from the back of his neck.
Another man was rushed by a mob on Spring Street. He was punched in the face and kicked for about 20 seconds before police made it to the scene. After that beating was broken up, the man began running south on Spring Street, only to be chased down by a protester and slugged in the face. He collapsed and his face slammed to the curb as protesters began pummeling him again.
The bloodied man was then escorted away by police. Both victims were treated and released, police said.
His sign, unclear in its intended meaning, read "Christianity=Paganism=Heathen$" with an arrow pointing at a swastika.
"Gosh, I think he just didn’t have a clear message. I don’t even think he was a Nazi," said one man, looking at the broken pieces of the sign left behind.
The Left insists that these sorts of folks come from the Right, and thus it would be safe to assume, then, that those counter-protesters were mostly from the Left. For those who say that all this sort of physical violence comes solely from the Right (I’m looking at you, Dan) may need to rethink your premise. I think violence from both sides, fringe (relative to both sides) though it may be, is a reality. Many suggest that Limbaugh and Beck are to blame for violence. How about Olberman and Schultz now?
Anyone? Hello? Crickets?
Taranto goes on to make a very salient point about this actual racism vs. the accused racism of Tea Partiers.
If you haven’t heard about this until now, you’re not alone. Blogger William Jacobson points out that the media hardly noticed:
Outside of the local media and a handful of blogs, the event received scarce attention. None of the usual suspects bothered to cover or comment on it. Firedoglake and Huffington Post covered it, but we saw none of the hyperventilated commentary and lecturing that is directed at Tea Parties.
How curious. Tea Party events which are not white supremacist events are met with derision and abuse, while a real white supremacist rally is met mostly with silence.
There is a lesson here. The attacks on the Tea Parties have nothing to do with stamping out white supremacy and everything to do with shaping the political dialogue to stamp out legitimate opposition to Obama administration policies.
[…]
But Saturday’s tumult is a timely reminder that in 2010, as in 1999 [the date of a Klan rally in LA]–and, for that matter, in 1977, when the U.S. Supreme Court held that neo-Nazis had a right to march in Skokie, Ill.–white supremacy is a fringe ideology that appeals only to a minuscule number of weirdos.
The people who claim to be alarmed by the "racism" of the tea-party movement know this as well as we do–which is why they respond to a display of actual racism as nonchalantly as we do. They desperately attack the tea-party movement for the same reason we cheer it: because it is made up of ordinary Americans anxious and unhappy about the ever-expanding power of government over their lives.
A mass movement of Americans concerned about preserving their freedom is a threat to the political agenda of the left. A gathering of a few dozen actual white supremacists is a threat only to whatever shred of dignity the supremacists may retain.
Sorry for the long quotes, but this is a point that Taranto has been making for some time (which is why I highly suggest getting the daily e-mail of his column), and this particular incident highlights precisely the the disingenuousness of it’s being used as a political football by the Left. It’s the race card they play; a game to stifle dissent (such dissent formerly being the highest form of patriotism).
We are post-racial only to the point that charges of racism aren’t used as some political ploy. Actual racism is very much on the decline, as President Obama’s election highlighted brightly. It shows that the Tea Party’s detractors have very little in their corner. They’re reduced to name-calling.
Filed under: Democrats • Liberal • Politics • Race Issues
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Anyone has a right in the U.S. to believe any fool thing they wish. That does not mean they are exempt from the penalty for expressing a really stupid view.
One would be really stupid to try to burn a U.S. flag in protest at a VFW convention. Most states have a tort exception for “fighting words.” This guy rather begged to be beaten, and was.
Is his speech for unlawful discrimination, for unlawful hate, different from a 70-year-old woman walking to the Selma, Alabama, Courthouse, to register to vote? I think so.
Why are you defending this guy? His injuries are unfortunate. If one wishes not be involved in a barroom brawl, one should not venture into barrooms demanding a fight.
Or, are you saying that this guy is no different in his racist views than the average Tea Bagger, and he deserves better protection?
Anyone has a right in the U.S. to believe any fool thing they wish. That does not mean they are exempt from the penalty for expressing a really stupid view.
I never disputed that. And I never defended this guy. Did you read the post? Did you read the two sentences before the line you quoted (never mind the whole paragraph)? I said:
For those who say that all this sort of physical violence comes solely from the Right (I’m looking at you, Dan) may need to rethink your premise.
That’s my main point. I do know folks, and see them in the media, that think this sort of violence is solely a right-wing phenomenon. This was a contrary example.
Further, the Left likes to blame the usual suspects; Limbaugh et al. If that’s the case, will they now blame Olberman et al? If not, then their finger-pointing is just self-serving. They’re not (hence the crickets), so QED.
What I resent is your comparison of a neo-Nazi provoking his intended victims, to John Lewis’s peaceful riding through the South on a Greyhound bus.
A black man riding to visit his mother is not the same thing as a skinhead spitting at a black woman. The first does not invite the violence that nearly killed him. The second one is an idiot.
I’m making no such comparison of equality at all, so I’m not sure what you’re resenting.
I’ll re-re-state my point for you Ed, but it’s the last time; the Left has a double-standard when it comes to protester violence, turning a blind eye to it from the Left, but over-hyping it from the Right. The “violent tea partier” is an animal virtually entirely sprung from the mind of liberal commentators. And as I noted, there are folks that, believing what the liberal media has fed them, think that there is no problem with it on the Left. That’s wrong.
And while they like to blame Limbaugh, Beck, et. al. for whatever right-wing violence they can scrounge up, they do not hold their commentators to the same standard when left-wing violence occurs. That’s wrong.
Put the straw men away for a bit, will ya’?