James Taranto is hit…

James Taranto is hitting on all cylinders in his essay “Why I’m Rooting For The Religious Right” (free registration required for link), which explains why he’s doing that in spite of not belonging to that group. This is just a group of quotes from the article that I have to give a hearty “Amen” to.

I am not a Christian, or even a religious believer, and my opinions on social issues are decidedly middle-of-the-road. So why do I find myself rooting for the “religious right”? I suppose it is because I am put off by self-righteousness, closed-mindedness, and contempt for democracy and pluralism–all of which characterize the opposition to the religious right.
…
For the most part, the religious right has responded in good civic-minded fashion: by organizing, becoming politically active, and supporting like-minded candidates. This has required exquisite discipline and patience, since changing court-imposed policies entails first changing the courts, a process that can take decades. Even then, “conservative” judges are not about to impose conservative policies; the best the religious right can hope for is the opportunity to make its case through ordinary democratic means.
…
Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, recently framed the abortion debate in this way: “What we want to debate is who gets to choose: Tom DeLay and the federal politicians? Or does a woman get to make up her own mind?” He also vowed that “we’re going to use Terri Schiavo,” promising to produce “an ad with a picture of Tom DeLay, saying, ‘Do you want this guy to decide whether you die or not? Or is that going to be up to your loved ones?’ ” Many voters who aren’t pro-life absolutists have misgivings about abortion on demand and about the death of Terri Schiavo. By refusing to acknowledge the possibility of thoughtful disagreement or ambivalence, Mr. Dean is giving these moderates an excellent reason to vote Republican.

Curiously, while secular liberals underestimate the intellectual seriousness of the religious right, they also overestimate its uniformity and ambition. The hysterical talk about an incipient “theocracy”–as if that is what America was before 1963, when the Supreme Court banned prayer in public schools–is either utterly cynical or staggeringly naive.
…
And the religious right includes not only Christians of various stripes but also Orthodox Jews and even conservative Muslims. Far from the sectarian movement its foes portray, it is in truth a manifestation of the religious pluralism that makes America great. Therein lies its strength.

This is a wake-up call to moderates, and even socially conservative Democrats, as to how liberals are trying to “frame the debate”, as opposed to just debate the issues. They use labels like “extremist” and “theocrat” to avoid reasoning; dissing instead of discussing. That’s all they have left, apparently.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!