Perhaps It’s a Double Standard Based On Science?
Steven Hawking is one of the most brilliant scientists of our time, and we’re lucky to have him. In earlier days, his disability might have relegated him to being homebound, and he probably wouldn’t have lived nearly this long, robbing humanity of his intelligence.
However, he’s apparently branching out into a new area that he is not as well versed in; religion.
In his latest book, The Grand Design, an extract of which is published in Eureka magazine in The Times, Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.”
He added: “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”
In A Brief History of Time, Prof Hawking’s most famous work, he did not dismiss the possibility that God had a hand in the creation of the world.
He wrote in the 1988 book: "If we discover a complete theory, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason — for then we should know the mind of God.”
In his new book he rejects Sir Isaac Newton’s theory that the Universe did not spontaneously begin to form but was set in motion by God.
Scientists have a conniption when theologians delve into the scientific realm. But apparently, that doesn’t work both ways in Prof. Hawking’s estimation.
Frankly, I think there can be spill over to each other. The God of creation made us to be curious and made the order of the universe understandable to us. I just would like scientists, who frown when a religious person appears to infringe on territory they claim exclusive rights to, would judge themselves by their own standards when moving the other direction.
Filed under: Religion • Science
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Leave a Reply