Could “Ahnold” be in…
Could “Ahnold” be in as much trouble as Gray Davis was when the latter was thrown out of office?

What once seemed unthinkable has now become a reality: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s approval ratings have plummeted to Gray Davis levels, and the cornerstone of his ”Year For Reform” agenda is on shaky ground.

In 90 days, Schwarzenegger’s popularity has tumbled by 20 points and potential voters are now voicing doubt about the state spending restrictions the Republican governor wants them to approve in a special election this fall.

Just 40 percent of Californians think Schwarzenegger is doing a good job and half say he’s faring poorly, according to the non-partisan survey by the Public Policy Institute of California released today.

That’s a big tumble in a short amount of time, and it suggests either a PR situation (not enough for him or too much against him) or the advancement of a very unpopular policy. The administration seems to think it’s a combination of the two.

The numbers suggest that the governor’s attempt to get back on offense by jettisoning his contentious pension overhaul plan so he could focus on other proposals has so far failed. Now some Republican strategists are suggesting that Schwarzenegger consider abandoning the special election.

But there are few indications that the governor plans to back down. On Wednesday, Schwarzenegger’s political advisers met with top Republican lawmakers to discuss campaign strategy.

Margita Thompson, the governor’s press secretary, said the governor’s approval ratings and support will rise once they begin a more aggressive campaign.

”The governor still believes that we need change and we need it as soon as we can,” she said.

Part of the question has to be how badly do Californians want to have their government operating with fiscal responsibility. Democrats, fond of giving away more and more of your money, have been able to count on the votes of those who get the money. Asking people to do with less from the government is always a hard sell, but Democrats have been especially protective of their own special interest groups rather than the state as a whole.

Heading into his second year as governor, Schwarzenegger had enviable support from two-thirds of Californians, including a majority of independent voters and more than 40 percent of Democrats.

But his support among Democrats and independents began to erode in January when he unveiled his 2005 agenda that took aim at Democrats and their union allies. Rather than accede to his demands, the governor’s opponents quickly organized to challenge Schwarzenegger and his proposals.

“We like our bankruptcy just fine, thank you.” How thoughtful. And here’s the PR campaign that could be a big part of the cause of the drop.

The aggressive campaign, complete with millions of dollars in TV commercials attacking Schwarzenegger, has taken its toll. The governor’s 20-point slide is more precipitous than Davis’ tumble in 2001 when the Democratic governor stumbled through the state energy crisis. At that time, the governor’s approval ratings fell from 62 percent to 46 percent over four months.

In a bid to get back on track, Schwarzenegger earlier this month abruptly pulled one of the four main pillars of his ”Year for Reform” package that would have revamped state retirement plans. Support for the proposal dwindled as a parade of police and fire widows went public with concerns that the changes would deny them benefits.

Bringing in people with “concerns” needs to be backed up with actual proof that these concerns about a bill are founded, or at least with ideas on how to temper it. Instead Democrats use concerned widows for political advantage; to torpedo the whole thing. Why not just argue the merits in the legislature?

At the time, Schwarzenegger aides trumpeted the move as a strategic retreat that would deprive Democratic opponents of their main bludgeon. Instead, it has allowed Schwarzenegger critics to turn their sights on the new centerpiece of his special election package: an initiative that could contain excessive state spending and revamp the formula for funding schools.

The poll found just 44 percent of likely voters favor the idea while 37 percent said they are opposed.

If the governor can’t rally support for that proposal, which Thompson called ”the most important leg of the stool,” it could further undermine prospects for a special election this fall.

And the question returns: How badly do Californians want a fiscally responsible government? When a reform is taken off the table, they’re against the next one in line. Part of this could be the battle of the PR campaigns, but people (everywhere, not just in California) need to decide realistically what they want from government and work toward that. Instead, they’re saying essentially that they want the budget fixed without raising taxes or cutting spending.

Make your choice and stick with it.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!